Hong Kong Crypto License
Hong Kong Crypto License: Navigating the Evolving Digital Asset Landscape and SFC Authorization
Hong Kong has emphatically positioned itself as a premier global hub for the regulated digital asset economy. The introduction of the Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) licensing regime in June 2023, overseen by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), transitioned the territory from an “opt-in” framework to a mandatory licensing regime under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO) (Cap. 615). This decisive regulatory clarity—coupled with the territory’s robust common law system and attractive tax neutrality—has solidified the Hong Kong Crypto License as a benchmark for institutional trust and compliance worldwide. Securing the SFC VASP License is not a simple registration; it is an exhaustive, multi-phased authorization process demanding absolute adherence to rigorous standards of financial soundness, technological resilience, and impeccable governance. The commitment required is substantial, but the resultant regulatory credibility is unparalleled in Asia.
Key Regulatory Legislation and Authorities
The governance of Virtual Asset (VA) activities is a coordinated effort between three primary bodies, ensuring comprehensive oversight:
Securities and Futures Commission (SFC): The principal licensing and supervisory authority for Virtual Asset Trading Platforms (VATPs) and other VA intermediaries. The SFC enforces compliance with the AMLO and the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO) (Cap. 571).
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO) (Cap. 615): This is the principal legislation under which the Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) licensing regime is mandated. The Ordinance specifies the detailed Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) requirements, particularly concerning Know Your Customer (KYC), Customer Due Diligence (CDD), and Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STRs).
Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA): Plays a critical role in managing financial stability, especially concerning the upcoming Stablecoin Ordinance (effective August 2025) and overseeing banks that provide banking services to licensed VASPs.
Corporate, Governance, and Personnel Prerequisites
The foundation of the Hong Kong Crypto License is the applicant’s corporate and human structure. The SFC mandates a strong, local presence and highly qualified personnel who satisfy the stringent Fit and Proper Assessment Hong Kong.
Local Incorporation and Physical Presence
Local Incorporation: The applicant must be a company incorporated in Hong Kong or an overseas company registered under the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) that maintains a permanent place of business in Hong Kong. Shell operations or minimal local staff are explicitly deemed insufficient by the SFC.
Central Management and Control: The VASP must demonstrate that its key personnel, including those responsible for the trading system and compliance, are based in Hong Kong and exercise central management and control over the VA trading platform operations within the jurisdiction.
The Fit and Proper Assessment Hong Kong
The Fitness and Properness Requirements are applied to the applicant entity, its Responsible Officers (ROs), Licensed Representatives (LRs), and all substantial shareholders (holding 10% or more). This assessment is continuous.
| Criterion | Key Focus Area | SFC Expectation |
| Financial Status | Solvency, bankruptcy history, creditworthiness. | Applicant and key personnel must demonstrate financial soundness and integrity. |
| Competence/Experience | Educational qualifications, professional background, relevant experience in finance/technology. | ROs must possess sufficient academic and industry qualification to carry out Relevant Activities competently. |
| Reputation/Integrity | Criminal record, AML/CTF history, disciplinary actions, litigation history. | Absolutely clean record; any past failures in compliance or honesty will result in rejection. |
**The SFC is obliged to refuse a licence application if the applicant fails to satisfy the Commission that it is fit and proper to be licensed.
Key Personnel Mandates: Responsible Officers (ROs)
The designation of Responsible Officers is the most crucial personnel requirement.
Minimum ROs: At least two individuals must be approved by the SFC as Responsible Officers (ROs) for the relevant regulated activities.
Role and Responsibility: ROs are personally responsible for overseeing the operation of the licensed VASP and ensuring full compliance with the AMLO and the Guidelines for Virtual Asset Trading Platform Operators (VATPs).
Accreditation: ROs must possess the necessary industry qualification, satisfy the competence requirements (often including specific local regulatory framework paper requirements), and demonstrate sufficient authority to supervise the business of Relevant Activities.
Financial Soundness and Capital Requirements
The Hong Kong Crypto License regime imposes robust Financial Resources Requirements (FRR) to ensure stability and investor protection. This includes strict mandates for initial capital, liquid assets, and compensation arrangements.
Minimum Capital Requirement Hong Kong
The required capital is split into Paid-Up Share Capital and Liquid Capital.
| Licence Type (AMLO) | Minimum Paid-Up Share Capital (HKD) | Minimum Liquid Capital (HKD) |
| VASP Trading Platform | HKD 5,000,000 | HKD 3,000,000 |
| VASP Custodian | HKD 10,000,000 | HKD 3,000,000 |
| Stablecoin Issuer (HKMA, Post-Aug 2025) | HKD 25,000,000 | Full reserve backing with high-quality, liquid assets |
In addition to the minimum liquid capital, VATPs must hold excess liquid capital equal to at least 12 months of operating expenses. This forward-looking operational reserve is essential for demonstrating financial sustainability.
Insurance and Compensation Arrangements
Due to the inherent risks of digital asset custody (e.g., hacking, employee fraud), the SFC mandates comprehensive insurance or compensation arrangements.
Cold Wallet Coverage: The compensation arrangement must cover at least 50% of client virtual assets held in cold storage (offline systems).
Hot Wallet Coverage: The compensation arrangement must cover 100% of client virtual assets held in hot wallets (online storage).
Forms of Compensation: Acceptable forms include professional indemnity insurance, bank guarantees, and dedicated funds held in demand or fixed deposits. This requirement serves as a vital safeguard, demonstrating the SFC’s institutional approach to client asset protection.
AML/CTF and Financial Crime Compliance
The core of the VASP licensing regime is the enforcement of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO). Licensed VASPs are treated as Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs), subject to the highest standards of AML/CTF compliance.
Know Your Customer (KYC) and Due Diligence (CDD)
VASPs must implement a robust, risk-based approach to client identification and verification.
-
Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Mandatory CDD checks are required for all customers, establishing and verifying the identity of the customer and the beneficial owner prior to commencing a business relationship.
-
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): EDD is required for high-risk clients, including Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), those from high-risk jurisdictions, and those involved in complex or unusually large transactions.
-
Sanctions Screening: Continuous screening against international sanctions lists and watchlists is mandatory for all customers and transactions.
The FATF Travel Rule Implementation
Hong Kong has implemented the FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) to enhance transaction traceability.
-
Threshold: VASPs must collect and share originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers exceeding a specified threshold (currently HKD 8,000 or equivalent).
-
Information Exchange: The required information includes the name, account number/wallet address, and physical address of both the sender and recipient. This necessitates investment in reliable RegTech solutions to securely share and verify transaction data in real time.
-
Transaction Monitoring: VASPs must utilize reliable AML/CFT software to monitor transactional behaviour for suspicious activities, such as structuring, abnormal high-volume transfers, or interaction with known illicit addresses.
Reporting and Record-Keeping
-
Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs): VASPs must file Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) to the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit (JFIU) immediately upon detecting or suspecting money laundering or terrorist financing activities.
-
Record Retention: Comprehensive records of all transactions, CDD/EDD files, and risk assessments must be maintained and easily retrievable for at least six years.
Technology, Cybersecurity, and Asset Custody Mandates
The SFC’s requirements for the Digital Wallet Service License and the VATP platform are exceptionally detailed, focusing on technological integrity and the security of client assets.
Client Asset Segregation and Storage
No Commingling: Commingling of client virtual assets with the firm’s or affiliate’s assets is strictly prohibited. Client assets must be held in segregated accounts.
Cold Storage Mandate: At least 98% of client virtual assets must be stored in cold wallets (offline, air-gapped storage). This policy is enforced to protect against online hacking and theft.
Hot Wallet Management: The remaining hot wallet assets (max 2%) must be secured by multi-factor authentication, strictly limited employee access, and transaction limits.
Key Management System (KMS)
Access Control: Access to client assets and private keys must be severely restricted to only Responsible Officers, Managers, and their delegates.
Multi-Signature Policy: The generation, storage, and use of private keys must be controlled by a robust multi-signature policy using certified Hardware Security Modules (HSMs). The SFC heavily scrutinizes the Key Management Policy (KMP) as key security failure represents the highest operational risk.
Contingency Planning: Comprehensive contingency plans must be implemented to protect against third-party custody failures or operational breakdowns, requiring redundancy and a clear Disaster Recovery (DR) procedure.
IT Security Audit and Penetration Testing
A robust governance framework for technology risks is mandatory, requiring external validation.
External Assessment: VASP applicants must appoint an External Assessor (EA) approved by the SFC. The EA conducts a two-phase assessment: Phase 1 (Design Effectiveness), submitted with the application, and Phase 2 (Implementation and Effectiveness), submitted after approval-in-principle.
Cybersecurity Audits: Regular independent cybersecurity audits and penetration tests (Pen Test) of the entire platform, network, and application layer are mandatory to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Risk Governance: The VASP must have a dedicated Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) reporting directly to the Board or Risk Committee.
Market Conduct, Investor Protection, and Suitability
The SFC’s primary mandate is the protection of investors, leading to strict rules on market conduct and client engagement, particularly for retail investors.
Retail Investor Access and Suitability
As of 2025, licensed platforms are permitted to serve retail investors, subject to stringent safeguards.
Suitability Assessment: The VASP must conduct thorough suitability assessments to ensure that retail clients understand the risks associated with virtual assets. The complexity and high volatility of crypto trading necessitate this high level of due diligence.
Risk Disclosures: Prominent and clear risk warnings regarding the speculative nature of VAs and the risk of total capital loss must be displayed.
Onboarding Limits: The SFC may impose limits on exposure or transaction sizes for less experienced retail investors, based on the VASP’s internal risk classification.
Token Admission Requirements
Licensed VATPs can only offer virtual assets that have been formally approved by the SFC for listing. This process ensures a controlled market environment and shields investors from highly speculative, unvetted tokens.
Eligibility: Generally, tokens must be eligible large-cap virtual assets included in at least two acceptable indices issued by independent index providers.
Due Diligence: The VASP must conduct and record rigorous due diligence on each token and its issuer, including legal status, team background, and technological stability.
Stablecoin Rules: Following August 2025, only specified stablecoins issued by a HKMA-licensed stablecoin issuer will be eligible for trading.
Prevention of Market Abusive Activities
The trading platform must be equipped with sophisticated automated trade monitoring and supervisory controls to prevent market manipulation.
Abuse Types: Systems must detect and prevent wash trading, spoofing, front-running, and other manipulative or abusive trading practices.
Data Reporting: VATPs are required to produce Shared Order Book data and market surveillance records to the SFC promptly upon request, supporting the regulator’s investigative function.
The Application Procedure and Ongoing Obligations
The application process is structured, formal, and conducted primarily via the SFC’s WINGS platform.
The WINGS Application Submission
The applicant submits a consolidated application covering the requirements under both the AMLO (VASP License) and, if applicable, the SFO (Type 1 and Type 7 Regulated Activities).
| Application Stage | Key Deliverable | SFC Outcome |
| Pre-Submission | Confirmation of local incorporation, appointment of ROs/LRs, and engagement of the External Assessor (EA). | Establishes preliminary eligibility. |
| Phase 1 Submission | Full application bundle, Phase 1 External Assessment Report (Design Effectiveness), AML/CTF Manual, Risk Management Framework, and Proof of Capital. | The SFC assesses whether the systems and policies are designed in accordance with the VATP Guidelines and AMLO. |
| Approval-in-Principle | Resolution of all Deficiency Notices (DNs) and confirmation of key personnel approvals. | SFC grants conditional approval. |
| Phase 2 Submission | Phase 2 External Assessment Report (Implementation Effectiveness) and final capital injection proof. | SFC verifies that systems are fully operational and effective. |
| Licence Grant | Final licence granted by the SFC. | VASP is fully authorized to commence operations. |
Ongoing Regulatory Obligations
Maintaining the Hong Kong Crypto License requires continuous compliance and reporting.
Financial Returns: Submission of regular financial and liquidity returns to the SFC to prove continuous adherence to the Minimum Liquid Capital requirements.
Annual Audits: Filing of annual audit questionnaires and comprehensive reports verifying financial status and operational compliance.
Material Breach Reporting: Mandatory reporting of material breaches or non-compliance incidents (e.g., security breaches, significant regulatory lapses) to the SFC without delay.
The Future: Stablecoins and Intermediary Licensing
The Hong Kong regulatory roadmap is continually expanding, focusing on key areas that will shape the future of the digital asset industry.
The HKMA Stablecoin Ordinance
The HKMA will introduce a dedicated Stablecoin Issuer license for fiat-referenced stablecoins.
Capital Requirements: Issuers must maintain a minimum HKD 25 million in paid-up share capital.
Reserve Backing: Stablecoins must be fully reserve-backed with high-quality, liquid assets, subject to strict operational standards and audits.
Regulatory Focus: This move aims to ring-fence systemic risk associated with payment stablecoins and ensure full consumer confidence and stability.
Licensing for VA Dealers and Custodians
Regulatory proposals are also advancing to establish explicit licensing frameworks for Over-The-Counter (OTC) VA Dealers and standalone Custodians, separate from the primary VATP regime.
VA Dealer: Requires maintaining at least HKD 5 million in paid-up share capital.
VA Custodian: Requires at least HKD 10 million in paid-up share capital, reflecting the heightened risk profile associated with client asset safekeeping.
Request more information
Tax Neutrality and Strategic Advantages
The territorial tax system of Hong Kong provides a significant competitive advantage to licensed Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) and professional investors operating within the jurisdiction.
-
No Capital Gains Tax:
-
Principle: Hong Kong does not impose a capital gains tax.
-
For Investors: Profits derived from long-term crypto investments are generally not taxed for individuals.
-
-
Profits Tax on Professional Trading:
-
Regulation: Profits generated from frequent, high-volume, and professional trading activities may be classified as business income.
-
Taxation: Such income is subject to the competitive Profits Tax.
-
-
Corporate Tax:
-
Rate: Locally derived corporate profits are subject to a highly attractive Corporate Tax rate of 16.5%.
-
-
Tax Neutrality (VAT/GST Exemption):
-
Asset Classification: Cryptocurrencies are classified as intangible assets.
-
Advantage: Virtual asset transactions are typically exempt from VAT/GST, providing a substantial cost advantage over many other global financial centers.
-
Checklists and Strategic Compliance Milestones
VASP Application Readiness Checklist
Corporate Governance and Risk Frameworks
The SFC’s governance expectations reflect the standards of traditional financial institutions. The VASP must implement a robust Risk Management Framework that permeates every layer of the organization.
The Risk Management Framework (RMF)
The RMF must be board-approved and regularly reviewed, covering the full spectrum of risk specific to virtual assets.
Operational Risk: Focuses on the security of the trading platform, including system uptime, data integrity, and cybersecurity risks. The RMF must incorporate the findings from the Pen Test and IT Security Audit processes.
Financial Crime Risk: Specifically addresses AML/CTF risks, compliance with the Travel Rule, and sanctions screening effectiveness.
Market Risk: Addresses the risk associated with proprietary trading (if applicable), liquidity risk of listed tokens, and the potential for market abuse.
Custody Risk: Detailed protocols for the physical and logical security of cryptographic keys and the separation of client funds from corporate funds.
The Risk Management Committee must independently review and challenge management’s assessment of these risks, ensuring a culture of caution.
Segregation of Duties and Information Barriers
To mitigate conflicts of interest and reduce the risk of internal fraud, the SFC mandates strict structural separation.
Trading vs. Custody: The personnel and systems involved in trade execution must be physically and logically separate from those managing the Digital Wallet Service and private keys.
Proprietary vs. Client Dealing: For firms that operate both a proprietary dealing desk and a client brokerage (e.g., if licensed under SFO Type 1/7), an absolute Information Barrier (“Chinese Wall”) must be maintained. This prevents proprietary traders from exploiting insider information regarding client order flows.
Third-Party Outsourcing Risk
VASPs often rely on external providers for cloud computing, custody solutions, or AML software. The SFC strictly regulates this reliance.
Due Diligence: VASP management is responsible for conducting thorough due diligence on all external service providers, assessing their security, financial viability, and compliance history.
Contingency: The Business Continuity Plan (BCP) must specifically address the failure of critical third-party providers, requiring diversification and clear exit strategies. The SFC has explicitly criticized platforms that demonstrate high dependence on a single external system service provider for their entire virtual assets custody system.
Licensing Integration: SFO and AMLO Regimes
While the VASP license falls under the AMLO, many platforms are also required to hold licences under the SFO, necessitating a dual-licensing approach.
The Dual Licensing Requirement
The need for a dual license depends on the nature of the assets traded:
AMLO VASP License: Mandatory for operating a centralized trading platform for non-security tokens (e.g., Bitcoin, Ethereum, utility tokens).
SFO Type 1 (Dealing in Securities) & Type 7 (Providing Automated Trading Services): Required if the platform facilitates the trading of assets that meet the definition of a “security” under the SFO (i.e., security tokens or tokens that resemble a collective investment scheme).
To avoid contravention of the licensing regimes and to ensure business continuity, most major platforms apply for licenses under both the AMLO and SFO regimes through a single consolidated application.
Licensed Representative (LR) Requirements
Below the Responsible Officer (RO) level, individuals who perform Relevant Activities must be approved as Licensed Representatives (LRs).
Sponsorship: LRs must be sponsored by the licensed VASP.
Competency: They must meet the SFC’s requirements for competence, which often involve passing specific industry examinations related to the SFO and AMLO regulations.
Supervision: All activities of the LRs must be supervised by the designated Responsible Officers.
The External Assessment
The two-phase External Assessment process is unique to the Hong Kong Crypto License and serves as the SFC’s technical verification mechanism.
Design Effectiveness
Focus: Assesses whether the VASP’s systems, controls, and policies are designed effectively to comply with the VATP Guidelines before the platform is operational.
Key Review Areas: Review of documentation, including the Key Management Policy, IT security architecture diagrams, AML/CTF manuals, and the BCP.
Outcome: The SFC uses this report to determine if the VASP has a fundamentally sound, compliant design.
Implementation and Effectiveness
Focus: Assesses whether the VASP has successfully implemented the approved design and whether the systems are operating effectively in a live or near-live environment.
Key Verification Areas: Verification of the 98% cold storage ratio, confirmation of multi-signature policy adherence (witnessing key ceremony), testing the effectiveness of the AML Transaction Monitoring system, and validating RTO/RPO in the BCP test.
Requirement: This report is submitted after Approval-in-Principle but before the final license is granted, confirming practical, operational readiness.
The VASP must exercise due skill, care, and diligence in the selection and appointment of the external assessor, ensuring their expertise, experience, and track record are acceptable to the SFC.
Ongoing Compliance and Reporting Metrics
Maintaining the SFC VASP License involves rigorous, recurring reporting to demonstrate continuous adherence to the Financial Resources Requirements and operational mandates.
Financial and Liquidity Reporting
VASPs must continually demonstrate that they meet the ongoing capital maintenance requirements.
Liquid Capital Calculation: Regular calculation and submission of the Liquid Capital status, proving that the VASP holds the required HKD 3,000,000 (or more) plus the 12 months of operating expenses in excess liquid capital.
Early Warning: If the VASP’s liquid capital falls below 120% of the required minimum, it must immediately notify the SFC and submit a remediation plan.
Annual Audit and Disclosures
Financial Audit: An annual audit covering the financial statements and the VASP’s compliance with the Client Asset Rules (segregation, cold storage ratios) is mandatory.
Annual Questionnaire: Submission of an Annual Audit Questionnaire to the SFC, confirming adherence to all regulatory guidelines.
Disclosure of Client Holdings: The VASP must regularly disclose the aggregate value of client virtual asset holdings to the SFC.
Market Manipulation and Insider Trading Controls
Licensed platforms must implement comprehensive policies to detect and prevent insider trading and market abuse by their own employees.
Employee Trading Policies: Strict rules governing VASP employees’ personal trading activities, often involving blackout periods, pre-clearance requirements, and restrictions on trading assets listed on the VASP’s own platform.
Surveillance: The platform’s trade monitoring system must be used internally to monitor for any suspicious trading activities originating from employee or proprietary accounts.
The Global Convergence on Hong Kong's VASP Framework
The rigour of the Hong Kong Crypto License is most evident in its Financial Crime Compliance requirements. The AMLO mandates a strict Risk-Based Approach (RBA), demanding Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for all high-risk accounts, particularly those associated with Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs). The implementation of the FATF Travel Rule is enforced via a low threshold (HKD 8,000), compelling VASP applicants to integrate advanced Travel Rule Compliance Solution (TRCS) technology to facilitate mandatory information exchange between financial institutions. Continuous, automated AML Transaction Monitoring is essential, as the failure to file timely Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) is grounds for severe penalties, including license revocation. The focus extends beyond basic Know Your Customer (KYC) to verifying the Source of Funds (SOF) and overall Source of Wealth (SOW) for major capital contributions, directly addressing global illicit finance concerns.
Technological Assurance: Custody, HSMs, and External Assessment
The technical requirements for the Hong Kong Crypto License demand institutional-grade security. The SFC mandates stringent Asset Segregation and a strict storage policy: at least 98% of client virtual assets must be protected in Cold Storage. The remaining assets in hot wallets require 100% insurance coverage, supplemented by the general requirement for compensation arrangements covering 50% of cold storage assets. Key security relies on certified Hardware Security Modules (HSMs), governed by a multi-signature policy, overseen by the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). Crucially, the External Assessor (EA) provides independent verification via the two-phase report process. The Phase 1 Report (Design Effectiveness) and the Phase 2 Report (Implementation Effectiveness) confirm that the VASP’s technology, including its Business Continuity Plan (BCP) and Disaster Recovery (DR) protocols, is robust and fully operational before the final SFC licence is granted. The meticulous technical review by the External Assessor is a unique and defining feature of the Hong Kong framework.
Capital Adequacy and Financial Sustainability
Adherence to the Minimum Capital Requirement Hong Kong is dynamic, not static. The VATP licence mandates at least HKD 5 million Paid-Up Share Capital and HKD 3 million Liquid Capital. Furthermore, the VASP must maintain excess liquid capital equivalent to at least 12 months of operating expenses, ensuring the platform’s long-term sustainability even in adverse market conditions. This Financial Resources Requirements (FRR) is continuously monitored via regular liquidity returns submitted through the WINGS platform. This emphasis on financial soundness ensures that Hong Kong Crypto License holders can withstand market volatility and protect client assets.
Future Horizons: Stablecoins and Expanded Licensing Scope
The regulatory architecture is expanding with the anticipated HKMA Stablecoin Ordinance, effective mid-2025. This will introduce dedicated licensing for fiat-referenced stablecoin issuers, requiring substantial capital (HKD 25 million) and full reserve backing with high-quality liquid assets, positioning Hong Kong at the forefront of payment token regulation. Simultaneously, the SFC continues to refine its stance on intermediary licensing, with proposals advanced for standalone licenses for VA Dealers and VA Custodians, further segmenting the market and enforcing institutional-grade controls across the entire digital asset value chain. The ability of the VATP to serve retail investors is conditional upon rigorous suitability assessments and strict adherence to token admission requirements, which favor eligible large-cap virtual assets.
In-Depth Risk Management Framework (RMF) Analysis
The Risk Management Framework (RMF) required by the SFC is not a mere formality; it is a live document that demonstrates the VASP’s proactive capacity to identify, measure, monitor, and control the unique risks inherent to operating a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP). This framework must be independently reviewed by the Risk Committee and the External Assessor (EA).
Categorization and Mitigation of Specific Risks
The RMF must systematically address the following non-exhaustive list of critical risks, beyond the standard operational and financial crime risks:
Technology and Cybersecurity Risk: This is the highest-priority risk category for the SFC. Mitigation strategies must detail defense mechanisms against Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, internal system penetration, and Key Management System (KMS) compromise. The RMF must specify Recovery Time Objectives (RTO) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) for all critical trading and custody functions, validated through annual Business Continuity Plan (BCP) stress testing. The reliance on Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) must be clearly documented as the primary mitigation tool against private key exposure.
Liquidity Risk: Addresses the risk that the VASP cannot meet immediate client withdrawal requests, particularly during periods of high market volatility or following a bank run. Mitigation involves maintaining sufficient liquid capital (above the Minimum Liquid Capital threshold), diversifying custody arrangements, and implementing clear, pre-agreed operational limits on client withdrawals if system integrity is compromised.
Settlement and Custody Risk: Addresses the risk of failed transactions or loss of assets during the transfer between the hot and cold storage environments. Mitigation requires strict adherence to the 98% Cold Storage Policy, utilizing verifiable multi-signature policies, and ensuring the Asset Segregation protocols are auditable at all times. The RMF must detail the liability waterfall in case of a Digital Wallet Service failure, whether internal or external.
Legal and Regulatory Risk: Focuses on the risk of license revocation or substantial fines due to non-compliance with the AMLO or the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO). Mitigation requires mandatory, documented staff training, continuous monitoring of regulatory updates (including the HKMA Stablecoin Ordinance), and independent oversight by the Compliance Officer.
The Risk Management Framework serves as the VASP’s core defense document, demonstrating systematic control over the high-risk operational environment.
Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis
A static RMF is insufficient. The SFC expects evidence of dynamic risk control through regular stress testing.
Market Stress Scenarios: Testing the VASP’s capital adequacy and operational stability under extreme market conditions (e.g., a 50% drop in Bitcoin price within 24 hours). The results must confirm that the Minimum Liquid Capital requirements are maintained.
Security Breach Scenarios: Simulating a successful Penetration Test (Pen Test) exploit targeting the hot wallet or the trading engine database. The Incident Response Plan (IRP) must be activated and timed to ensure adherence to mandated reporting timelines (immediate notification to the SFC).
Third-Party Failure Scenarios: Testing the ability of the VASP to transition all critical functions (e.g., AML monitoring, custody processing) when a core third-party provider fails. This validates the effectiveness of the Contingency Planning strategy.
The outcomes of all stress tests and scenario analyses must be formally reviewed and signed off by the Board of Directors and the Risk Committee.
Strategic Capital Raising and Shareholder Due Diligence
The financial onboarding of the VASP’s initial capital and subsequent funding rounds is subjected to the same rigorous scrutiny as the Fit and Proper Assessment Hong Kong applied to personnel. The SFC’s focus is on preventing the use of the platform for money laundering from inception.
Source of Funds (SOF) and Source of Wealth (SOW) for Substantial Shareholders
Every substantial shareholder (holding 10% or more) and their related entities must provide transparent and verifiable documentation regarding their capital contributions.
SOF Mandate: Documentation must demonstrate the specific origin of the funds used to purchase the VASP shares (e.g., sale of a business, inheritance, accumulated profits). The SFC requires bank statements, audited financial reports, or legal documentation tracing the funds back to their immediate source.
SOW Mandate: For high-value contributions, the SFC requires proof of the shareholder’s overall financial history and accumulation of wealth (SOW). This requires demonstrating a legitimate and credible accumulation of the capital used, providing assurance that the funding is clean and sustainable.
Foreign Investors: Foreign investors are subject to intensified scrutiny. The SFC often requires opinions from local counsel in the foreign jurisdiction to verify the legality of the funds and the Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs). Any lack of transparency or difficulty in verifying the SOF/SOW of substantial shareholders is an immediate red flag that will halt the application process.
Managing Deficiency Notices (DNs) and SFC Dialogue
The application process is a continuous dialogue, formalized by the issuance of Deficiency Notices (DNs) from the SFC. The applicant’s response strategy is critical for the timeline of the Hong Kong Crypto License approval.
Timeliness and Quality: DNs demand a high-quality, precise, and timely response. The applicant should engage legal and compliance counsel to ensure that all answers directly address the SFC’s concerns, citing the relevant section of the VATP Guidelines or the AMLO.
Common DN Areas: DNs most frequently query the practical implementation of the Travel Rule Compliance Solution (TRCS), the robustness of the Key Management Policy (KMP), and the perceived experience of the proposed Responsible Officers (ROs) in handling the complexity of the platform’s operations.
Strategic Escalation: In complex or unprecedented cases, the VASP’s legal team may need to request a formal meeting with the SFC to present mitigating arguments or propose alternative compliance measures that achieve the same regulatory outcome. Failure to effectively manage Deficiency Notices is the single biggest cause of prolonged application timelines, often extending the process beyond 18 months.
Marketing, Public Communication, and Conflict Management
The SFC imposes strict, detailed requirements on how VASP licensees market their services, communicate risks, and manage conflicts of interest, reflecting its commitment to protecting retail investors.
Marketing and Advertising Guidelines
All marketing materials must comply with the SFC’s guidelines, which prohibit misleading or exaggerated claims.
Factual Accuracy: Marketing must be strictly factual. Prohibited are any claims of guaranteed returns, low risk, or promises of exceptional performance without a balanced disclosure of risks.
Mandatory Risk Disclosures: All advertisements, especially those targeting retail investors, must prominently feature clear, easily understandable risk warnings about the volatility and the risk of total loss of invested capital. The SFC actively monitors online and social media promotional materials to ensure compliance with these disclosure mandates.
Separation of Asset Classes: If the VASP also deals in traditional securities (SFO Type 1/7), marketing for security tokens must be clearly separated from marketing for non-security tokens (VASP license activities) to avoid confusing investors about the regulatory protections applicable to each.
Conflicts of Interest Management
The VASP must proactively identify and manage potential conflicts of interest inherent in operating a centralized trading platform.
Proprietary Trading: If the VASP engages in proprietary trading or market making, the Information Barrier (“Chinese Wall”) must be robustly documented and tested. The rules must prevent the VASP’s proprietary desk from utilizing advance knowledge of large client orders or market movements derived from the platform’s internal data.
Token Listing Decisions: The VASP’s process for Token Admission Requirements must be free from influence by the exchange’s proprietary trading desk or affiliated entities. Any financial interest the VASP or its affiliates have in a listed token must be disclosed to the SFC and the public.
Fee Transparency: All trading fees, custody fees, withdrawal fees, and any hidden costs must be fully disclosed to the client at the time of account opening, ensuring maximum transparency regarding the cost of using the Digital Wallet Service and the trading platform.
The VASP must adopt a policy that ensures that the interests of the client always take precedence over the interests of the VASP or its employees.
Public Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Status: The VASP must clearly and accurately disclose its licensing status (SFC VASP License) on its website and in all official communications.
Major Events: Any event that could materially impact the VASP’s operations or financial viability (e.g., a major security breach, legal action, or significant change in capital position) must be immediately reported to the SFC and publicly disclosed in a fair, accurate, and transparent manner.
FAQ
The AMLO VASP Licensing Regime is mandatory for platforms trading non-security virtual assets (like Bitcoin) and focuses on AML/CTF compliance. The SFC Type 1 and Type 7 Licenses are required if the platform trades any virtual asset that is legally classified as a security token. Most comprehensive centralized exchanges require both to use the SFC Dual Licensing Strategy.
The VASP applicant must appoint at least two SFC Responsible Officer (ROs) for each licensed activity. ROs must reside in Hong Kong (or be readily available), possess relevant industry experience, and pass the rigorous Fit and Proper Test SFC regarding their competence, qualifications, and integrity.
The HK VASP Custody Requirements mandate that a licensed VATP must hold at least 98% of all client virtual assets in segregated cold storage (offline, air-gapped systems) within an Associated Entity. This is strictly verified during the External Assessment Report SFC audit, which tests the operational effectiveness of the cold storage and key management protocols.
The EA conducts the mandatory, independent audit required by the SFC. They assess the design and operational effectiveness of the platform's systems and P&Ps (Policies and Procedures). The EA works under a Tripartite Agreement SFC with the applicant and the SFC, ensuring the audit meets the regulator’s high standards before the license is granted.
While there are base capital requirements, the most critical financial requirement is maintaining sufficient liquid capital equivalent to at least 12 months of operational expenses. This buffer must be proven through financial projections and ongoing reporting, ensuring the platform's sustainability.
The regulation of fiat-referenced stablecoins falls under the HKMA Stablecoin Regime, administered by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). Issuers must be licensed by the HKMA and must comply with strict 100% reserve backing and segregation requirements, effective August 1, 2025.
Yes, if a fund manager’s portfolio includes Virtual Assets exceeding a certain threshold (typically 10%), they are required to obtain an SFC Type 9 License (Asset Management). This ensures that the management of VA funds adheres to the same prudential rules as traditional asset management.
Get in touch with our experts
Need a quick question answered? Our support team is available to answer any queries seven days a week.