Regulatory Licensing and Compliance Advisory
Licensium — Crypto, Gambling & Fintech Licensing Advisory
Licensium is an international regulatory advisory firm specialising in crypto license, gambling license, iGaming license, fintech license, and offshore licensing solutions across Europe, Asia, and recognised international jurisdictions.
We structure regulatory models that meet capital requirements, AML/CFT standards, and supervisory expectations — ensuring that your business is not only licensed, but operationally compliant and bank-ready.
Our Core Services
Crypto License Advisory
Licensing for exchanges, VASP/CASP providers, wallets, and digital asset platforms with full AML, governance, and reporting frameworks.
Gambling & iGaming License
Online casino, sportsbook, B2B gaming and crypto gambling licensing across EU, offshore, and selected Asia-Pacific jurisdictions.
Fintech & Payment Licensing
Payment institution and regulated fintech structuring aligned with regulatory and banking requirements.
Jurisdictional Coverage
- Europe (EU regulatory frameworks)
- Offshore licensing environments
- Select Asia-Pacific jurisdictions
- Dual and multi-jurisdiction structures
Our Approach
We treat each engagement as a structured regulatory project:
- Jurisdiction analysis
- Capital and substance modelling
- Compliance framework design
- Application preparation
- Regulator interaction
- Ongoing compliance support
Build a Defensible Regulatory Structure
If you are planning to obtain a crypto license, gambling license, iGaming license, fintech license, or offshore license in 2026, Licensium provides structured advisory for sustainable international expansion.
Schedule a consultation to evaluate your licensing strategy.
At Licensium, our mission is to deliver regulator-defensible crypto license, gambling license, and fintech licensing solutions for businesses operating in complex and high-risk regulatory environments.
We design structured compliance frameworks that align governance, capital requirements, AML/CFT obligations, and operational readiness before any licensing application is submitted. Our objective is not only regulatory approval, but long-term supervisory stability across Europe, offshore jurisdictions, and selected international markets.
We support startups, scale-ups, and established operators in the cryptocurrency, iGaming, and fintech sectors, ensuring that each licensing structure remains viable under ongoing regulatory oversight, audit review, and evolving compliance standards.
Our vision is to become a trusted international regulatory advisory for crypto, gambling, and fintech businesses operating in regulated and high-risk markets worldwide.
We aim to redefine how licensing and compliance are structured — not as formal approvals, but as durable regulatory frameworks capable of withstanding real supervisory review, audits, and evolving regulatory standards across jurisdictions.
Licensium envisions a market environment where crypto licensing, gambling licensing, and fintech regulatory approval are built on governance discipline, AML/CFT integrity, capital adequacy, and long-term operational resilience.
As global regulatory frameworks continue to evolve, we strive to remain a reliable partner for companies seeking sustainable market entry, cross-border scalability, and institutional-grade compliance structures.
Regulated-Market Specialisation
We operate exclusively in crypto, gambling, iGaming, and fintech licensing environments where regulatory approval depends on supervisory interpretation, enforcement practice, and operational discipline — not generic incorporation templates.
Jurisdiction-Specific Regulatory Insight
Each jurisdiction — whether EU, offshore, or Asia-Pacific — is treated as a distinct supervisory ecosystem. We design licensing structures aligned with local regulatory expectations, capital requirements, AML/CFT standards, and practical approval thresholds.
Structural, Not Formal, Licensing
A crypto license, gambling license, or fintech authorization is approached as a full operating model assessment. Governance, capital adequacy, substance, outsourcing controls, and compliance execution are aligned before submission.
Supervision-Ready Delivery
Our frameworks are designed to withstand regulatory audits, information requests, and ongoing supervisory scrutiny. Licensing approval is treated as the start of regulatory accountability, not the endpoint.
Controlled End-to-End Engagement
We manage each project as a structured regulatory build — from perimeter analysis and jurisdiction selection to regulator interaction and post-licensing compliance monitoring.
Risk Containment & Regulatory Clarity
We identify regulatory risk, structural gaps, and supervisory red flags early — reducing delays, refusals, and post-approval remediation exposure.
Discretion & Institutional Integrity
All engagements are delivered with strict confidentiality, ethical discipline, and professional data governance standards.
Our Services
Licensium Partners
FAQ
Licensing analysis begins with regulatory perimeter assessment. We review the functional activities of the business — custody, exchange, issuance, payment processing, B2C gaming operations, B2B platform services — and map them against jurisdiction-specific definitions. The key question is not what the business calls itself, but how regulators classify the actual activity.
Most delays or refusals are not caused by documentation gaps but by structural weaknesses. Regulators focus on governance clarity, risk ownership, capital adequacy, outsourcing controls, and operational substance. Where decision-making authority is unclear or compliance functions lack independence, supervisory concerns arise.
Substance is evaluated through management presence, local control functions, documented risk frameworks, and demonstrable operational capacity. Supervisors increasingly test whether the licensed entity can operate under continuous oversight, rather than acting as a formal shell structure.
No. Licensing is a supervisory process and final decisions rest with the regulator. Our role is to structure the application, governance model, and compliance framework so that the submission aligns with supervisory expectations and withstands regulatory scrutiny.
Documentation typically includes governance structure, internal control framework, AML and risk policies, capital planning analysis, operational procedures, and management suitability information. Requirements vary by jurisdiction, but supervisory authorities consistently expect structured and coherent documentation sets.
Jurisdiction selection is based on business model alignment, capital capacity, geographic exposure, supervisory intensity, and long-term operational strategy. We compare regulatory frameworks, enforcement posture, and reputational impact before recommending a jurisdictional direction.
Yes. Licensing is treated as the beginning of a regulated lifecycle. We support ongoing compliance structuring, governance refinement, supervisory interaction preparation, and cross-border expansion analysis where required.
EU frameworks generally involve higher capital thresholds, formalised governance requirements, and ongoing reporting obligations. Offshore regimes may offer structural flexibility but often carry increased banking sensitivity and correspondent risk considerations. The choice must reflect long-term strategic positioning rather than short-term cost efficiency.