Gambling License in Philippines
The Philippines as a Dynamic Gaming Hub
The Philippines stands out in the Asian region as a major, dual-regulated hub for both land-based casinos and online gambling. The jurisdiction is unique due to the presence of two distinct licensing bodies: the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR), which primarily governs integrated resorts and domestic online operations, and the Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA), which licenses operators targeting international markets from the Freeport.
Obtaining a Gambling License in the Philippines offers operators a strategic gateway to the lucrative Asian market, benefiting from robust IT infrastructure, competitive operational costs, and a clear legal framework. The country’s gaming sector is undergoing constant evolution, particularly the Philippine Offshore Gaming Operator (POGO) regime (primarily under PAGCOR), which has attracted significant foreign investment despite recent regulatory adjustments.
The dual regulatory structure—PAGCOR for national focus and CEZA for international export—makes the Philippines a unique and versatile licensing destination in Asia.
The Dual Regulatory Landscape: PAGCOR vs. CEZA
Understanding which license is appropriate depends entirely on the operator’s target market and business model.
The Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR)
PAGCOR is a government-owned and controlled corporation directly under the Office of the President. It operates as both an operator of government casinos and as the primary regulator for private commercial gaming.
Target Market: PAGCOR licenses historically targeted the domestic Philippine market (land-based and online/remote gaming) and, most notably, the Offshore Gaming Operator (POGO) regime, which licenses companies based in the Philippines to serve players outside the country.
Scope: PAGCOR licenses cover integrated resorts, electronic games, poker, sports betting, and remote gaming platforms.
Regulatory Focus: Ensuring probity in gaming operations, raising government revenues, and promoting the tourism industry.
The Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA)
CEZA is a special economic zone authority that governs the Cagayan Special Economic Zone and Freeport (CSEZFP). It offers a different licensing path focused purely on international (B2C) operations.
Target Market: CEZA-licensed operators must not target Philippine residents. The license is exclusively for operating international online gaming platforms from the Freeport.
Scope: Permits include Interactive Gaming Licences, Sports Betting Licences, and E-Casino Licences.
Tax Incentives: CEZA is attractive due to special fiscal incentives and simplified bureaucratic processes within the economic zone. CEZA licenses are primarily suited for operators with an explicit focus on the Asian regional market, excluding the Philippines itself.
Philippine Offshore Gaming Operator (POGO) Regime (PAGCOR)
The POGO regime has been the high-frequency keyword and the most discussed regulatory model in the Philippines. It is defined as “an entity that offers gambling services to offshore customers.”
Structure and Taxation
POGO licensing requires two components: the Offshore Gaming License for the operational side and a Service Provider License for BPO functions (e.g., live chat, marketing).
Gaming Tax (GGR Duty): POGO licensees are subject to a 5% gaming tax on their Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) derived from their offshore operations. This is a crucial element of the tax burden.
Corporate Income Tax (CIT): POGO entities are also subject to a standard Corporate Income Tax (CIT) on non-gaming income.
Fees: Licensees must pay application fees, monthly fixed supervision fees, and performance bonds to PAGCOR.
Compliance and Operational Requirements
POGO operators face significant operational mandates to ensure compliance and social responsibility:
Server Location: Core gaming servers and player registration data must be located within the Philippines for PAGCOR’s direct monitoring.
AML/KYC: Operators must implement rigorous Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols, reporting suspicious activities to the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC).
Local Office and Personnel: A strong physical presence with a local corporate entity and dedicated, vetted personnel (including a Compliance Officer and a Designated Official) is mandatory.
CEZA Interactive Gaming License Requirements
The CEZA licensing structure provides a clear alternative for international B2C operators, focusing on the Cagayan Freeport Zone.
License Categories
CEZA offers licenses tailored to specific operational needs:
Interactive Gaming License: The most comprehensive category, covering online casino, poker, and other peer-to-peer games.
Sports Betting License: Specific authorization for offering fixed-odds and live in-play sports wagering.
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) License: For companies providing back-office, technical, or customer support services to the main license holders.
Financial and Operational Obligations
CEZA focuses on attracting technologically advanced operations with substantial capital:
Capitalization: Applicants must demonstrate adequate paid-up capital, typically requiring a minimum of USD $1 million for the primary Interactive Gaming License.
Fees: Annual licensing fees are competitive, with an initial application fee followed by a substantial annual recurring fee (often in the range of USD $100,000).
Tax Incentives: CEZA operators benefit from tax holidays, duty-free importation of equipment, and a lower effective tax rate on gross income earned within the zone, making it highly attractive for cost-efficient B2C operations.
Due Diligence and Integrity Vetting
Both PAGCOR and CEZA impose stringent due diligence requirements on all applicants to ensure the integrity of the Philippine gaming industry.
Key Personnel and Shareholder Vetting
The “fit and proper” test is applied to all major stakeholders and key staff:
Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs): All shareholders holding 10% or more must submit detailed personal and financial vetting forms, including full disclosure of their Source of Funds (SoF) and Source of Wealth (SoW).
Key Officials: Directors, the CEO, the MLRO (Money Laundering Reporting Officer), and the Compliance Officer must be named, vetted, and approved by the respective regulator. This rigorous vetting process ensures that the license is held only by reputable entities, upholding the country’s commitment to preventing money laundering.
Technical Audit and System Integrity
System integrity is critical for both regulators.
Test House Certification: The gaming platform (RNG, game fairness, security protocols) must be audited and certified by an Independent Gaming Test House approved by PAGCOR/CEZA.
Internal Controls System (ICS): A detailed document outlining all operational, financial, and security procedures (Internal Controls System) must be submitted and approved before any operation can commence.
Request more information
Taxation and Financial Burden Comparison
The tax regime is the most significant differentiating factor between POGO (PAGCOR) and CEZA operations.
POGO (PAGCOR) Financial Obligations
| Fee/Tax Type | Rate / Structure | Applicability |
| Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) Tax | 5% of gross gaming revenue | Offshore operations only |
| Corporate Income Tax (CIT) | 25% to 30% | Applied to non-gaming income |
| Supervision Fees | Fixed monthly amount | Payable to PAGCOR |
CEZA Financial Incentives
CEZA offers a more streamlined and preferential tax regime designed to attract foreign investment into the special economic zone.
| Tax/Incentive Type | CEZA Benefit | Rationale |
| Income Tax | 5% Gross Income Tax (GIT) | In lieu of all national and local taxes |
| Import Duties | Duty-free importation | For gaming and IT equipment |
| Local Taxes | Exempt from almost all local taxes | Within the Cagayan Freeport Zone |
The 5% Gross Income Tax (GIT) in CEZA, applied in lieu of all other national and local taxes, represents a powerful and simplified fiscal advantage for international B2C operators.
Deep Dive into AML/KYC and Financial Crime Compliance
The Philippines is under the scrutiny of international bodies like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) regarding its anti-money laundering framework. Consequently, both PAGCOR and CEZA licenses mandate strict adherence to local laws, enforced primarily by the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC).
AML Compliance and the AMLC
The Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) classifies gaming operators, including POGOs and CEZA licensees, as Covered Institutions, subjecting them to rigorous obligations.
Mandatory Reporting Thresholds: Operators must file mandatory Covered Transaction Reports (CTRs) and Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) to the AMLC. CTRs are triggered by single transactions exceeding a specific threshold (e.g., PHP 500,000 or equivalent).
MLRO Appointment: A competent, fully vetted Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) is mandatory for both PAGCOR and CEZA licensees. The MLRO is the key liaison with the AMLC and is personally accountable for the implementation of the Money Laundering Prevention Program (MLPP).
Risk Assessment: Licensees must conduct an AML Risk Assessment of their customer base, identifying higher-risk jurisdictions, transaction types, and payment methods. The controls applied to customers from FATF high-risk countries must be significantly enhanced.
The rigorous reporting regime and direct oversight by the AMLC ensure Philippine licensees are held to international standards, mitigating risks associated with cross-border financial crime.
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) Procedures
Standard Know Your Customer (KYC) requires basic ID verification. However, Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) is mandatory for higher-risk profiles:
PEP Screening: All customers must be screened against global databases for status as a Politically Exposed Person (PEP). If identified, the customer is subject to ongoing monitoring and high-level management approval for high-value transactions.
Source of Wealth (SoW) Documentation: For large deposits or withdrawals, the operator must obtain documented proof of the customer’s Source of Wealth (SoW) and Source of Funds (SoF) to confirm the legitimacy of the money.
Sanctions Screening: Continuous screening against national and international sanctions lists is a critical, auditable component of the AML program.
Responsible Gaming (RG) Obligations and Player Welfare
The social responsibility aspect is closely monitored by both PAGCOR and CEZA, especially given the rapid expansion of remote gaming.
RG Measures and Implementation
Licensees must implement robust measures to protect vulnerable persons and prevent gambling addiction.
Exclusion Mechanisms: Operators must offer clear, easily accessible Self-Exclusion options with a defined cooling-off period and an inability for the player to reopen the account immediately. The process must be verified and auditable.
Financial Limit Tools: Mandatory tools for players to set deposit limits, loss limits, and time limits are required. Any request to increase a limit must be subject to a mandatory delay (e.g., 24 hours) to prevent impulsive decisions.
Training and Awareness: All customer-facing employees, including BPO staff, must receive mandatory, documented training on identifying signs of problem gambling and how to apply intervention protocols. Compliance with Responsible Gaming protocols must be continuously demonstrated through audit logs and employee training records, confirming a commitment to social welfare.
Prohibition on Domestic Targeting
A key regulatory constraint is the absolute prohibition on targeting the domestic market:
PAGCOR POGO: Must exclusively market and accept bets from players outside the Philippines.
CEZA: Must strictly serve players outside the Cagayan Economic Zone and the wider Philippines. Geo-blocking and IP checks are mandatory compliance checks.
Political Landscape and POGO Regulation Dynamics
The regulatory environment, particularly concerning Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs), has been subject to significant political and legislative debate, which applicants must consider.
Historical Challenges and Regulatory Risk
The POGO sector has faced political pressure due to issues related to taxation, labour practices, and money laundering accusations.
Tax Disputes: Historically, disputes over the correct taxation rate and structure for POGOs have created uncertainty. While the 5% GGR tax is currently enforced, operators must budget for potential future regulatory shifts.
Public Perception: The industry faces ongoing scrutiny from the public and certain lawmakers, leading to regulatory crackdowns and increased compliance overhead. Operators must navigate a dynamic political landscape, necessitating continuous engagement with local consultants and full adherence to all updated government and labour regulations.
Benefits of Operating within the CEZA Framework
For operators prioritizing regulatory stability and tax clarity, the CEZA framework often presents a lower political risk:
Fiscal Stability: The 5% Gross Income Tax (GIT) within the Freeport is legally defined and is applied in lieu of all national and local taxes, providing superior clarity and protection against sudden national tax hikes.
Streamlined Governance: The CEZA authority manages the zone autonomously, leading to more consistent and simplified bureaucratic processes for licensees based within the Freeport.
Comparative Analysis: Philippines vs. Other Asian Licenses
When pursuing the Asian market, the Philippines must be compared against jurisdictions like Kahnawake (which licenses global operators but targets Asia) and Curacao (a popular, low-cost option).
Philippines (PAGCOR/CEZA) vs. Curacao
The choice is often between regulatory rigour and minimal cost.
| Feature | Philippines (PAGCOR/CEZA) | Curacao |
| Regulatory Reputation | High (Government-controlled, AMLC oversight) | Low (Single Master License) |
| Corporate Tax (Effective) | 5% GGR (PAGCOR) / 5% GIT (CEZA) | 2% Net Profit Tax |
| Physical Substance | Mandatory (Local office, Directors, Servers) | Not strictly enforced |
| Market Focus | Exclusive access to Asian Market | Global (no specific geographic focus) |
The Philippine license, despite higher operational costs, offers a level of governmental validation and banking trust that the Curacao license cannot match, which is critical for accessing premium Asian payment channels.
Philippines (PAGCOR) vs. Kahnawake (KGC)
Kahnawake, a Canadian territory, also licenses operators serving the Asian market.
| Feature | Philippines (PAGCOR) | Kahnawake Gaming Commission (KGC) |
| License Type | Government Corporation | First Nations Territory |
| Required Servers | Mandatory Physical Location in PH | Flexible/Co-location permitted |
| Local Personnel | Mandatory Resident Directors | Not always mandatory for all roles |
| Tax Rate | 5% GGR Tax | 0% Tax (on licensed activity) |
For operators requiring demonstrable physical presence and high government oversight to satisfy specific Asian jurisdictions or banking requirements, the PAGCOR license is superior. The KGC offers a cheaper, faster process but less tangible substance.
Operational Expansion and the BPO Ecosystem
The Philippines offers a unique benefit through its extensive Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) ecosystem, which is directly integrated into the POGO and CEZA licensing regimes. This allows licensees to leverage the country’s skilled, English-speaking workforce.
Service Provider Licensing and Staffing
PAGCOR formally regulates the POGO Service Providers (PSPs), which are companies that supply the human capital and support services to the main POGO operator.
Regulated Services: PSPs provide crucial functions such as customer relationship management (CRM), technical support, marketing, and live dealer hosting. Each PSP must be licensed and registered with PAGCOR.
Labour Compliance: Licensees must strictly adhere to the Philippine labor code regarding employee benefits, working hours, and wages. The sheer volume of personnel involved in the POGO industry means labour compliance is a significant operational area that is heavily scrutinised.
Local Expertise: The availability of experienced IT professionals and multilingual customer support agents gives the Philippines a major operational advantage over smaller, less populated licensing jurisdictions. The robust BPO ecosystem reduces operational expenditure while ensuring the high-quality human resources necessary for international 24/7 gaming operations.
IT Infrastructure and Resilience
Both PAGCOR and CEZA require high technical standards for data security and operational resilience.
Data Mirroring and Storage: While PAGCOR allows some technical components to be hosted offshore, the primary player registration data and audit logs must reside on servers within the Philippines to ensure immediate access by regulators.
Disaster Recovery (DR): Comprehensive, tested Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Plans are mandatory. Given the Philippines’ geographical location, the ability to quickly recover data and resume operations after natural disasters (e.g., typhoons) is a non-negotiable compliance requirement.
License Application and Renewal Detailed Procedures
The detailed application process is complex and requires significant preparation and local assistance to navigate successfully.
PAGCOR POGO Application Phases
The POGO application is highly structured and involves extensive coordination with the government.
Pre-Application: Submission of a detailed Letter of Intent (LOI), a comprehensive Business Plan, and verification of corporate funds. This phase often involves preliminary discussions with PAGCOR officials.
Due Diligence & Vetting: Submission of all probity documents for key personnel and UBOs (as detailed in Section 5). This phase includes background checks and often requires interviews.
Technical Testing: Independent audit and certification of the gaming system and platform security by a PAGCOR-approved Test House.
Final Hearing and License Grant: Upon successful vetting and technical compliance, a formal hearing is conducted, followed by the issuance of the POGO license. The requirement for a fully detailed and compliant Business Plan from the outset ensures only serious, well-capitalized applicants proceed through the rigorous process.
License Renewal and Compliance Audits
Licenses are not permanent and require rigorous maintenance:
Annual Renewal: PAGCOR and CEZA licenses require substantial annual renewal submissions, including updated financial statements, proof of tax compliance (tax clearances), and certification of continuous adherence to AML/RG protocols.
Periodic Audits: Licensees are subject to unannounced inspections and periodic regulatory audits by the respective inspectorate teams to verify the ICS, server logs, and AML controls are operating as described.
Regulatory Powers and Sanctions Regime
The powers of both PAGCOR and CEZA to enforce regulations are significant, including the ability to impose hefty fines and revoke licenses.
Enforcement and Financial Penalties
Breaches of the AMLA or the licensing conditions carry severe penalties:
-
AMLC Sanctions: Violations of the AMLA, such as failure to file STRs or deliberate misrepresentation of financial data, can lead to massive administrative fines imposed by the AMLC, potentially running into millions of pesos, and even criminal prosecution.
-
PAGCOR Suspension/Revocation: PAGCOR has the authority to issue cease-and-desist orders, suspend operations, or outright revoke the POGO license for severe breaches, including failure to pay taxes or systemic failure to protect player funds.
-
CEZA Action: Within the Freeport, CEZA enforces compliance through fines and the cancellation of the license and tax incentives, effectively making the continued operation untenable. The high level of enforcement risk necessitates continuous, proactive legal and regulatory consulting for all licensed operators.
A Strategic Investment in the Asian Market
Obtaining a Gambling License in the Philippines—whether through the rigorous PAGCOR POGO regime or the tax-efficient CEZA framework—is a strategic move for any operator serious about penetrating the highly competitive and lucrative Asian market.
While the compliance requirements are demanding, encompassing detailed AMLC reporting, mandatory Responsible Gaming protocols, and significant local economic substance, the benefits are profound. The low, competitive tax rates (5% GGR or 5% GIT) combined with the stability offered by a dual government-regulated framework provide a sustainable platform for growth. The Philippine license remains a premier choice, offering the ideal blend of governmental authority, tax clarity, and direct access to the Asian demographic.
FAQ
The two main bodies are:
Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR): A government-owned corporation that acts as both an operator of government casinos and the regulator for private gaming, including the former Philippine Offshore Gaming Operator (POGO) regime.
Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA): The regulator for the Cagayan Special Economic Zone, which licenses Interactive Gaming entities that operate exclusively for offshore markets from within the Freeport.
Both PAGCOR and CEZA licensees are strictly prohibited from offering their online gaming services to Filipino citizens within the Philippines. The licenses are explicitly for targeting offshore players (foreign nationals outside the Philippines).
The fundamental regulatory principle is that all licensed online gambling activities must be exported, excluding the domestic Philippine market.
The POGO regime has undergone significant regulatory changes. While PAGCOR continues to regulate the industry, new licensing for the specific POGO model has been subject to moratoriums and increased scrutiny due to historical issues. Applicants must consult PAGCOR for the current status of the Offshore Gaming License before applying.
The primary advantages are:
Strategic Access to Asia: The Philippines is geographically and culturally positioned to serve the high-growth Asian market.
Favourable Tax Regime (CEZA): CEZA offers a highly competitive 5% Gross Income Tax (GIT) in lieu of all national and local taxes for qualifying enterprises within the Freeport.
Skilled Workforce: Access to a large, English-speaking, and technically proficient Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) workforce.
The difference lies mainly in location, tax, and governance:
PAGCOR (POGO): Allowed to operate nationwide (though compliance is strict). Subject to a 5% Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) tax on gaming income and regular corporate income tax on non-gaming income. Historically, PAGCOR has been involved in more regulatory disputes.
CEZA: Operations must be confined to the Cagayan Special Economic Zone and Freeport. They benefit from the stable 5% GIT incentive and are generally considered to have a more streamlined regulatory process within the economic zone.
Capital requirements vary significantly based on the type of license and the percentage of foreign ownership.
PAGCOR: Requirements for a primary gaming operation often involve a minimum paid-up capital stock of PHP 25 million (approx. USD $429K, though this fluctuates) for significant foreign equity.
CEZA: Operators often need to demonstrate a higher investment commitment, typically requiring a minimum of USD $1 million in paid-up capital for a primary Interactive Gaming License.
No. CEZA operates as an independent gaming authority under its own mandate (Republic Act No. 7922) and has the legal authority to license Interactive Gaming activities within its jurisdiction without requiring prior approval from PAGCOR.
Both regulators require a strong local presence:
Local Company: The operating entity must be duly incorporated and registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the Philippines.
Local Office: A verifiable physical office space is mandatory (within the CEZA Freeport for CEZA licensees).
Key Personnel: The company must appoint and maintain locally based, vetted personnel, including a Compliance Officer and a Designated Official/Resident Director.
The process is complex due to extensive due diligence and financial scrutiny. The timeline can vary greatly depending on the completeness of the application and the complexity of the corporate structure, but typically ranges from 3 to 6 months after all initial documentation and fees are submitted.
This is a rigorous background check applied to all Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs) and key officials (Directors, CEO, MLRO). It requires detailed personal, financial, and professional disclosures to ensure integrity and competence, including verification of their Source of Funds (SoF) and Source of Wealth (SoW).
Licensees are classified as Covered Institutions under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) and must:
Register with and report to the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC).
Appoint a local, vetted Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO).
File mandatory Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) and Covered Transaction Reports (CTRs).
Implement Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) procedures for Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and high-risk customers.
Philippine law imposes a final tax of five percent (5%) on the gross gaming revenue (GGR) derived from offshore gaming operations, in lieu of all other direct and indirect internal revenue taxes and local taxes.
CEZA licensees operating within the economic zone and complying with all conditions pay a simplified five percent (5%) Gross Income Tax (GIT) on their revenue, also in lieu of all other taxes, making it a highly attractive fiscal regime.
Yes. Alien individuals employed by an offshore gaming licensee or its service providers who are assigned to the Philippines are required to pay a final withholding tax of 25% on their gross income. The employer (licensee/PSP) is responsible for withholding and remitting this tax and ensuring the employee has a Tax Identification Number (TIN).
Tax delinquency is treated severely. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and PAGCOR/CEZA can impose massive fines, issue closure orders, revoke the license, and even initiate deportation proceedings against foreign employees of non-compliant companies and service providers.